CEIOPS looks at Solvency II developments
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) held its Members’ Meeting, where it addressed the development of Solvency II and approved its final “Answers to the European Commission’s third wave of Calls for Advice in the Framework of the Solvency II project”.
The advice covers features of the future prudential regime for insurance and reinsurance undertakings, including eligible elements to cover the capital requirements, co-operation between supervisory authorities, supervisory reporting and public disclosure, pro-cyclicality and small undertakings.
CEIOPS also approved its final ‘Recommendation on Independence and Accountability’. The advice is being submitted to the European Commission on CEIOPS’ own initiative together with its response to the third wave of calls for advice and concerns the independence and accountability of supervisory authorities generally and the supervisory review process specifically.
CEIOPS further approved its advice on the ‘Prudential treatment of ‘deeply subordinated debt’. The advice follows a request from the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Committee (EIOPC) for CEIOPS to consider a proposal on possible changes to its advice under the current insurance directives.
CEIOPS then approved its final specification for the second round of its ‘Quantitative Impact Study’ in the context of the Solvency II project. The draft specification had been the subject of earlier comments by CEIOPS members and of a recent ‘pre-test’, the results of which led to their finalisation. The specification, together with the related documentation, will be published at the due time for the commencement of the exercise. Issues discussed by CEIOPS in addition to Solvency II included agreement of its ‘Protocol Relating to the Cooperation of the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Union in Particular Concerning the Application of Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on Insurance Mediation’ (the Luxembourg Protocol). The Protocol provides for supervisory co-operation between competent authorities under the Insurance Mediation Directive.
Updated reports will be on the CEIOPS website shortly.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos