MoU between EU/EEA and Swiss supervisors on insurance supervision agreed
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) and the Federal Office of Private Insurance (FOPI) have released a memorandum of understanding (MoU) designed to facilitate information exchange between the EU/EEA Insurance Supervisors, which are all members or observers of CEIOPS, and the Swiss Supervisor.
It is hoped that by taking into account the nature of the group relationship of insurance or financial conglomerates, more effective and prudential supervision will be possible. The MOU states that an efficient co-operation between the competent authorities of the relevant countries is essential for achieving supervisory objectives, while minimising the administrative burden for the supervisory entities.
The MoU provides the legal basis for including FOPI in the work of the Coordination Committees (Co-Cos) that have been established under the umbrella of the Helsinki Protocol. Co-Cos have been established for each trans-national insurance group and comprise the national supervisors engaged in the day-to-day supervision of the entities of the relevant group.
“A Pan European insurance market requires the co-operation of supervisors beyond the borders of the EU,” the chairman of CEIOPS, Henrik Bjerre-Nielsen, said. “CEIOPSconsiders this MoU as the basis for building further co-operation with the Swiss Supervisory Authority.”
Click here for a copy of the MoU.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions