New double-counting methodology responsible for greater-than-expected rise in credit derivatives
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s mid-year survey of the over-the-counter derivatives market showed a substantial increase in credit derivatives notional volumes, growing from $918.9 billion at the end of 2001 to $1.6 trillion at mid-2002. But the figure this year was calculated according to a new adjustment rate to discount double counting, which eliminates trades between two counterparties being counted twice. This has put an excessively favourable sheen on the latest results, said Isda.
“Looking at the BIS survey, we drew the conclusion that the number of end-users were greater than the amount of dealers in the credit derivatives world. So, based on the BIS methodology, we raised our adjustment factor by 18%,” said Mengle. “Had we used the same adjustment factor for the previous survey, total credit derivative volumes would have been over $1 trillion at the end of last year,” he added.
According to Isda’s new methodology, credit derivatives volumes increased by 44% in the first six months of the year on a pro forma basis.
Interest rate and currency derivatives volumes also showed reasonable growth in the first half of the year, increasing by 19% to $82.7 trillion. Isda also surveyed the equity derivatives market for the first time. Total notional outstandings for equity derivatives stood at $2.3 trillion at mid-2002.
Isda’s mid-year derivatives survey is based on responses collated from around 80 of its member firms, including major derivatives houses, government entities and end-users.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises