UK watchdog will not pressure banks on advanced Basel II
The UK’s principal financial market watchdog will not pressure banks to adopt the advanced approaches to measuring risk capital under the Basel II banking Accord, UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) managing director Michael Foot said today.
Foot said the FSA had begun discussions with banking industry groups on the FSA’s plans to implement the standardised and advanced approaches to measuring operational risk, and on the internal ratings-based credit risk proposals of Basel II.
The complex and risk-based Basel II bank capital adequacy Accord proposes a range of simple to complex ways of measuring the risks faced by major banks to determine how much capital they should set aside to guard against risk.
Foot said the FSA would try to get the same message about not pressurising banks across to other national bank regulators.
He said the aim is easy enough to state – local flexibility for particular circumstances and broad consistency between countries on the main issues. “But no-one thinks the outcome will be easy to achieve,” he said.
Global banking regulators hope to introduce Basel II by the end of 2006. The European Commission wants to apply new capital adequacy rules closely modelled on Basel II to all banks and investment firms in the European Union, of which the UK is one of 15 member states.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules