UK watchdog will not pressure banks on advanced Basel II
The UK’s principal financial market watchdog will not pressure banks to adopt the advanced approaches to measuring risk capital under the Basel II banking Accord, UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) managing director Michael Foot said today.
Foot said the FSA had begun discussions with banking industry groups on the FSA’s plans to implement the standardised and advanced approaches to measuring operational risk, and on the internal ratings-based credit risk proposals of Basel II.
The complex and risk-based Basel II bank capital adequacy Accord proposes a range of simple to complex ways of measuring the risks faced by major banks to determine how much capital they should set aside to guard against risk.
Foot said the FSA would try to get the same message about not pressurising banks across to other national bank regulators.
He said the aim is easy enough to state – local flexibility for particular circumstances and broad consistency between countries on the main issues. “But no-one thinks the outcome will be easy to achieve,” he said.
Global banking regulators hope to introduce Basel II by the end of 2006. The European Commission wants to apply new capital adequacy rules closely modelled on Basel II to all banks and investment firms in the European Union, of which the UK is one of 15 member states.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive