UK watchdog will not pressure banks on advanced Basel II
The UK’s principal financial market watchdog will not pressure banks to adopt the advanced approaches to measuring risk capital under the Basel II banking Accord, UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) managing director Michael Foot said today.
Foot said the FSA had begun discussions with banking industry groups on the FSA’s plans to implement the standardised and advanced approaches to measuring operational risk, and on the internal ratings-based credit risk proposals of Basel II.
The complex and risk-based Basel II bank capital adequacy Accord proposes a range of simple to complex ways of measuring the risks faced by major banks to determine how much capital they should set aside to guard against risk.
Foot said the FSA would try to get the same message about not pressurising banks across to other national bank regulators.
He said the aim is easy enough to state – local flexibility for particular circumstances and broad consistency between countries on the main issues. “But no-one thinks the outcome will be easy to achieve,” he said.
Global banking regulators hope to introduce Basel II by the end of 2006. The European Commission wants to apply new capital adequacy rules closely modelled on Basel II to all banks and investment firms in the European Union, of which the UK is one of 15 member states.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption