NAB currency options desk 'back in the market', with limited trading
National Australia Bank (NAB) has resumed limited trading in currency options, as an April 30 deadline to amend its shortcomings passed last week, reports RiskNews ' sister publication FX Week .
Regulator the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Apra) barred NAB from trading foreign exchange options until it had rectified risk management lapses responsible for a A$360 million (US$280 million) hole in its currency options portfolio originally reported in January.
A spokesperson for NAB in Melbourne said the bank is currently working with Apra to address the issues raised in its March 24 report. An Apra spokesperson in Sydney said it was unable to discuss its communications with NAB, although a source close to the regulator said there was no reason to believe the April 30 requirement – a review of the bank’s traded risk limits – would not be met.
This was the most important of Apra’s demands, which it described as the "minimum" to be achieved before NAB could start trading forex options again.
NAB is also making efforts to resolve its failed options pricing processes – which meant the traders were able to input their own revaluation data to mask losses – by trialling a range of risk management systems, according to market sources.
And the bank has already made large strides in the "key staff changes" Apra referred to in its report. On April 21, it appointed Lynne Peacock, the bank’s executive general manager in Europe, to manage "people and culture functions". The bank has also replaced its chief executive, chairman, head of risk management, head of markets, head of corporate and institutional banking, and both co-heads of global foreign exchange in the wake of the crisis.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities