Isda says more work needed on accounting standard
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (Isda) has filed comments on the draft standard “Financial Instruments and Similar Items”, proposed by the Joint Working Group of Standard Setters (JWG).
“Isda welcomes the JWG’s initiative... however, our committee strongly agreed that a fair value model based on guidance contained in the draft standard would be significantly flawed,” said Robin Doyle, a vice-president at JP Morgan Chase and chair of Isda’s North American Accounting Committee.
As regards the proposed valuation methodology, Isda said the hierarchy would be too restrictive: “It may be more appropriate in some circumstances to refer to the market exit price for a similar asset on the reporting date, than attempt to adjust for an out-of-date market exit price for the same asset. Flexibility and fair judgment are tantamount in making appropriate fair valuations for an instrument.”
Although Isda agreed that a full fair value accounting model would eliminate the need for hedge accounting in many cases, it also believes that the “concept of hedge accounting remains relevant where financial instruments are used to hedge forecasted transactions like the future acquisition or disposal of non-financial items, or forecasted foreign currency revenues and expenses.”
On the issue of presentation and disclosure, Isda is pressing for further consideration by the JWG, suggesting that “wherever possible, disclosure should be based on information firms use to manage their businesses in order not to impose dual reporting burdens. At the same time, the disclosures must be carefully considered to ensure that they do not reveal proprietary trading information to competitors.”
Isda has also written to the JWG that it does not believe that “a period of two years is adequate for the implementation of an accounting standard that fundamentally changes the way entities will account for financial instruments”.
The association added that it recommends international standard setters to consider developing separate projects addressing each of the major areas covered in the Draft Standard, rather than tackling all the issues with a single document.
Rob Stevens, a managing director at CSFB and Isda’s European accounting committee chairman said: “In addition to comments on the technical aspects of the document, Isda is also concerned that the sheer volume of material covered in this draft resulted in a flawed consultation process. Addressing the issues through smaller, more focused projects would allow for a better assessment of the impact of implementation.”
“We suggest that the standard setters engage various constituents to field-test narrow segments of the guidance. We believe that taking the initiative to do this work early in the standard setting process will help greatly in providing rules that are clear and easy to apply to real business transactions. Otherwise we would find ourselves in a situation similar to that being experienced with SFAS 133, ‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’, SFAS 140 and IAS 39, ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’, where volumes of questions and answers need to be written just so constituents can understand how to apply the rules”, warned Isda.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB start dates must align globally, says European Commission
Lawmaker could trigger delay to market risk rules in Europe if US implementation drags on
Fed green lights more capital relief trades
Five US banks authorised to issue repeat credit-linked notes backed by financial guarantees
Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
Republicans are pushing for reproposal, but a rapid finalisation may prove less far-reaching
Isda pushes to ‘decouple’ Simm calibration from model changes
Emir 3.0 prompts effort to separate risk-weight revisions from methodology updates
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Most read
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- New FICC clearing model still holds fears for buy side
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets