Sarbanes grills Brickell over Ofheo nomination
The US Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on Mark Brickell’s nomination for director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo), the regulator for government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this afternoon. Brickell, former managing director at JP Morgan and more recently chief executive of electronic derivatives exchange Blackbird, faced hard questions about whether his work as an anti-regulation derivatives industry lobbyist should keep him from running Ofheo at a time when the GSEs are under fire for their derivatives use and accounting.
Sarbanes asked Brickell if he still believed, as he said in a 2000 letter to Ofheo, that the GSEs should be allowed to use internal models to set regulatory capital – a position Ofheo rejected in favour of using its own model. Brickell said he was merely trying to put forward some helpful ideas at the time on best practices. He added: “A rigid regime is not a tough regime. It gives [regulated entities] opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, which thwarts the purpose of the capital rules.”
Sarbanes also noted that Brickell opposed the passage of US fair value derivatives accounting standard FAS 133, and asked Brickell if he still opposed it. Brickell responded that he would enforce it as the “law of the land”. But Sarbanes was not satisfied; he pressed Brickell for an answer on whether he thought FAS 133 was a good or bad rule. “Sir, I don’t think it’s open to question by the director of Ofheo,” Brickell said. “I think it’s a great rule because it’s part of GAAP.”
But Sarbanes remained unsatisfied: “We had another nominee before us that never got confirmed because she said she did not have a view on the appropriate regulatory framework. Most [potential regulators] don’t come in with that attitude – they have a role in forming the regulation, so it’s important to know your position on the issues.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules