Poste Italiane to sue JP Morgan Chase
Two months after Risk broke the story of Poste Italiane’s derivatives losses as a result of exotic transactions with JP Morgan Chase and other banks, the large Italian state-owned post and financial services company is suing the US bank for €40 million.
Since Risk’s story was published, it has emerged that Catasta exceeded his mandate to hedge against currency and interest rate fluctuations for Poste using contracts with notionals not exceeding €50m. He has now been dismissed.
In its writ, Poste Italiane alleges that JP Morgan Chase was at fault by not checking Catasta’s authority before signing contracts with him for barrier quanto swap transactions linked to US interest rates. Not only were these transactions much bigger than Catasta’s notional limit, but they appear to have been highly speculative in nature. The lawsuit is likely to embarrass the US bank since it has recently been engaged by the Italian Treasury to advise on the reform of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, the Rome-based public financing body that has a 35% ownership stake in Poste Italiane.
A JP Morgan Chase spokesman confirmed that the bank had received a writ from Poste Italiane, but was unable to comment as the document was still under review. Poste Italiane also declined to comment.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs