Former UBS executives return bonuses
Senior employees who have left the troubled Swiss banking group UBS in the last year have waived or repaid SFr70 million ($58 million) in salaries and bonuses.
Previous board head Peter Wuffli declined the SFr12 million he was contractually entitled to while former board members Marcel Ospel, Stephan Haeringer and Marco Suter returned or waived an additional SFr33 million. A number of other former senior executives declined SFr22 million in salaries and bonuses.
"I would very much like to see more bonuses waived or returned in the interest of the bank. I am therefore continuing to hold discussions on the topic," Kurer said.
On November 17, UBS announced changes to its compensation system aiming to ensure that long-term and sustainable goals are emphasised as much as possible. While a combination of a fixed and variable compensation will continue to be used for most employees, the chairman will no longer receive bonus payments so that he can assess the board's compensations without conflict of interest.
From 2009, management salaries will be comprised of a fixed component, a variable cash component and a variable equity component. The variable cash component will be based on a bonus/penalty system with money deducted due to bad results or unfavourable events.
The equity component will also be subject to conditions; shares will not be transferred to the employee for three years, and the amount finally received will depend both on UBS' earnings and how its return on equity compares to other financial services firms. To encourage long term stability, members of the bank's management will be required to hold shares for a longer period of time before selling them.
Investors will have a greater say in compensation, with bonuses decided upon in a consultative way.
In October 16, the Swiss government stepped in to bail out UBS and took on up to $60 billion in illiquid assets. UBS said the move would give it Tier 1 capital of 11.5% by year end, and conversion of the debt held by the Swiss government would leave it with a 9.3% stake in the bank.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses
Asian firms waiting on exemptions from UST clearing mandate
Hoping for relief on extraterritoriality, 51% of Apac firms have yet to start compliance programmes
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption