Police question second SG employee
A new lead has emerged in the recent case of unauthorised trading at Société Générale (SG), which cost the bank €4.9 billion in January.
When news of the scandal broke in January, SG attributed the losses to unauthorised positions totalling €49 billion taken by a single person: Jérôme Kerviel, a junior arbitrage trader on its delta one equity derivatives desk.
Reports from Paris suggest the latest person brought in for questioning – believed to be a broker in the bank’s equity trading group - is not Moussa Bakir, a broker at SG subsidiary Fimat (renamed Newedge in January) who was questioned in February and named a material witness in the case. The broker was later released without charge.
Also on Wednesday, New York law firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll filed a class action lawsuit against SG. The claim was made on behalf of all investors who purchased the bank’s American depository receipts and US buyers of SG shares on overseas exchanges between August 1, 2005 and January 23, 2008.
The complaint – filed in the New York federal court – alleges SG made false statements regarding its subprime mortgage exposures and the strength of its internal controls, suggesting in particular the bank failed to act on several alerts that could have uncovered Kerviel’s trading activities sooner.
“It is apparent SG did in fact authorise a culture of risk to flourish, with the resulting detrimental impact to its shareholders,” said Steven Toll, managing partner at Cohen Milstein. “The enormous loss in the subprime market and the dramatic loss of $7 billion in the trading department were completely unexpected to those investing in SG securities.”
See also: Genius or blunder?
Back-office savvy aided SG fraud
SG losses likely to affect structured products business
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint