Merge SEC and CFTC, says former SEC commissioner
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should be merged into a single entity to consolidate futures and securities regulation in the US, a former SEC commissioner argued yesterday.
Speaking in a panel discussion at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma) market structure conference in New York on May 20, former SEC commissioner Annette Nazareth lamented that regulators are forgoing an opportunity to consolidate supervisory bodies with overlapping jurisdictions. Nazareth is now a partner at law firm Davis Polk in Washington, DC, and served as director of market regulation at the SEC between 1998 and 2005 and as an SEC commissioner from 2005 to 2008.
"If ever there was a time we should be able to make really far-reaching reforms, then it should be now. So it is very troubling to see that a merger between the SEC and CFTC is pretty much off the table for a year or two – which means it will be off the table for decades. There is absolutely no logic for that," she said. "We are the only country in the world that separates futures regulation from securities regulation. It was probably a mistake when it was done and now is really the time to consolidate it."
Nazareth's comments were echoed by Alan Beller, a partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb in New York and a former director of corporation finance at the SEC. "From a policy point of view, there is no good reason to have the two agencies separate, and my own view is not only should the SEC and the CFTC be under one roof but also the combined agency ought to have broader jurisdiction over financial products generally. I can't think of a good reason other than political difficulty to not have regulatory consolidation, but I am very pessimistic it will happen," he said.
While supervisory authority for commodity futures, options and derivatives clearing organisations lies with the CFTC, the SEC has oversight of clearing agencies and securities markets. This has led to uncertainty in the past over whether regulation of derivatives markets lies exclusively with one regulator, both or neither.
Derivatives dealers have argued that contracts such as credit default swaps are exempt from regulation by either party, as they are negotiated and traded between 'sophisticated parties' and so are excluded from regulation by the CFTC under Section 2(g) of the Commodity Exchange Act and by the SEC under Section 206A of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
For derivatives to be fully regulated under a combined SEC-CFTC, one of the congressional committees overseeing the two agencies – the House Committee on Financial Services or the House Committee on Agriculture – would have to agree to surrender its authority as supervisor of the new consolidated entity, another major impediment to consolidation.
"The problem is it would be extraordinarily difficult to do because congressional committees simply don't vote to reduce their jurisdiction," said Beller.
The panel bemoaned the "nonsensical alphabet soup" of maintaining four separate banking regulators and advocated not only merging the SEC and CFTC, but also consolidating the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). However, Nazareth warned political necessities could lead to the creation of a fifth banking supervisor in the form of a ‘systemic risk regulator' proposed by Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner.
"The OCC and the OTS do seem to be the lowest of the low-hanging fruit but I'm not convinced they will be [consolidated] in the first round of changes. That would be very positive if they were. If we were to create another regulator that really would be ill-advised and although it doesn't seem believable, it is actually possible in this political environment we could end up with more regulators. It's almost preposterous," Nazareth noted.
See also: Geithner calls for law change to force OTC derivatives clearing
Obama selects SEC and CFTC leaders
Portal combat
Lukken calls for regulatory overhaul as he prepares to step down
Vision on
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews
Europe’s next chore: cleaning a floor made messy by the US
Rejection of Basel III’s output floor leaves EU with some difficult decisions to make
G-Sibs face daily data headache from US surcharge proposal
Move to more frequent measurement would be “massively burdensome”, says senior exec
Regulators question human-in-the-loop as AI governance tool
Bank of England and FSB executives suggest it’s more important to retain overall accountability
Esma supervisory switch could become ‘distraction’
Push to transform watchdog might hinder market reforms, say some