Credit crisis losses could reach $400 billion
Write-offs of losses on securities linked to US subprime mortgages could reach $400 billion, according to German finance minister Peer Steinbrück, speaking after the recent G-7 meeting in Tokyo.
G-7 finance ministers and central bank governors met on February 9 to discuss issues facing the world economy, including the effects of the current global credit crisis. The G-7 has said it plans to act on the Financial Stability Forum’s (FSF) interim recommendations, released on February 5, “to rebuild confidence in the creditworthiness and robustness of financial institutions”.
The FSF recommended that financial institutions’ give timely and full disclosure of losses and valuation of structured products, called on regulators to improve transparency through the implementation of the Basel II framework, and recommended stronger liquidity risk management through the development of a global consistent approach by the Basel Committee.
In its report, the FSF also called for better understanding of financial institutions’ exposure to off-balance sheet vehicles, and improved transparency and origination standards in the originate-to-distribute model of structured products. It also criticized potential conflicts of interest and poor-quality information at credit rating agencies.
The FSF is a committee of international bank regulators and finance ministries set up in 1999 to promote international financial stability.
See also: Investigators step up pressure on rating agencies
UBS startles market with $14 billion writedown
Citigroup downgraded after monumental losses
Subprime losses hit Q4 results
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules