Merrill Lynch suspends equity derivatives trader
Merrill Lynch has initiated a probe into suspicious activity detected on one of its equity derivatives trading desks, suspending one of the traders at the desk.
The unnamed trader, who worked at a proprietary trading desk in London, is being investigated on suspicion of inflating mark prices on some of the single stock derivatives he traded.
Confirming the matter in an emailed statement, Jezz Farr, a London-based spokesman for the bank, said: “Our preliminary review determined that one desk used marks that appear to be outside of our accepted policy. We have suspended a trader and we continue to review this matter.”
The irregular valuations, which are said to have taken place in April, were flagged by the bank’s risk management system that routinely reviews the marks set by the traders. “This case shows our oversight system works,” said Farr.
This activity brings the bank's risk management system under further scrutiny, as it battles to regain shareholder confidence after racking up losses of about $37 billion in subprime debt-related asset writedowns and credit losses.
Merrill Lynch now joins the ranks of Credit Suisse and Société Générale, which have also been battling problems of rogue trader activity.
Credit Suisse on February 19 revealed a $2.85 billion writedown due to trader mis-markings and pricing errors in structured credit products, just a month after Société Générale stunned the financial markets with a €4.9 billion trading loss due to rogue activity by one of its traders.
See also : €4.9 billion fraud at Société Générale
Credit Suisse reveals $2.85bn subprime credit writedown
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’
Who is Selig? CFTC pick is smart and social, but some say too green
Colleagues praise crypto smarts and collegial style, but views on prediction markets and funding trouble Senate