US rule proposal could boost insurer derivatives use
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), an official body that develops model insurance regulations for adoption at the US state level, is considering a new accounting guideline that would allow US-based insurers to report hedge transactions in their underwriting income statements. All US insurers must comply with statutory accounting guidelines, so this potential change could encourage greater use of derivatives.
Remaining details will be discussed in a conference call next month.
Current US statutory guidelines require hedges to be reported in investment or other income, which has held up wider use of insurance risk hedging, according to Alton. “The accounting guideline we’re proposing for statutory is exactly what’s in FAS 133,” he said, referring to the new accounting standard requiring US corporations to mark their hedges to market. “If we can show we’ve transferred risk through a derivatives contract and the derivative's highly effective, then the benchmark is exactly the same for Gaap.”
Once entered on its underwriting income statement, a qualifying hedge under the new guideline could improve an insurer’s combined ratio and loss ratio, which measure insurer financial performance and credit quality.
Alton said the new guideline, if approved by the NAIC, and adopted by any US states, would not be a “night and day” change, but rather another tool for insurers to manage their risks in addition to traditional reinsurance.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’
Who is Selig? CFTC pick is smart and social, but some say too green
Colleagues praise crypto smarts and collegial style, but views on prediction markets and funding trouble Senate
EU single portal faces battle to unify cyber incident reporting
Digital omnibus package accused of lacking ambition to truly streamline notification requirements
Basel Committee members ‘buying time’ before fixing FRTB mess
Despite inconsistencies today, regulators maintain they want to align global regime eventually
How Basel III endgame will reshape banks’ business mix
B3E will affect portfolio focus and client strategy, says capital risk strategist