UK investor fears seem overdone, regulator says
It is right that regulators look hard at the UK’s regulatory regime to see whether improvements are needed to prevent a fraudulent attempt to inflate corporate earnings for personal gain, the UK’s chief financial regulator said today.
Davies said many investors have been shocked by a series of unpalatable revelations from US companies, in particular.
“Some of the previous comfortable certainties about corporate earnings and the integrity of company accounts have been thrown into question,” Davies said.
The UK cannot afford to be complacent - the prudent assumption must be that similar frauds could happen in Britain, he said.
That is despite UK accounting standards differing from those in the US, with UK accounting approaches often preferable to US ones. There is also a greater degree of independence built into the UK accounting and auditing regime, Davies said. But he added that a paper on options for auditing reform in the UK, to which the FSA is contributing, will be published shortly by the UK Treasury and the Trade and Industry Department.
“But while ‘it’ could happen here, so far it hasn’t,” Davies said. “We do appear to be buffeted by winds from across the Atlantic, rather than by any domestically generated bad weather,” he added
Davies said it was “slightly odd” that the fall in the FTSE 100 index of UK share prices was greater than that of the US Dow Jones index. The Dow has fallen by only 27% from its peak, compared with 40% for the FTSE, he noted.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack