UK FSA fines approach £100 million
How effective are the FSA’s efforts to deter market abuse?
LONDON – Fines administered by the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) since its creation in 2001 are approaching the £100 million mark. The regulator is particularly focusing on market abuse and Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) failings, and both of these areas have seen high-profile fines in the past year.
Almost 40% of this year’s £20.5 million in fines were levied against Santander-owned UK bank Alliance & Leicester (A&L). A&L and HFC Bank, part of HSBC, were jointly fined £8.1 million for mis-selling payment protection insurance – a key focus of the FSA’s TCF regime.
A number of cases in 2008 have related to market abuse, but most of these fines concern events that occurred several years ago. High-profile market abuse allegations relating to share prices in UK bank HBOS prompted an FSA investigation, but no charges were brought.
Selwyn Blair-Ford, a senior domain expert for UK regulation at FRSGlobal, says: “For the UK financial market as a whole, we can applaud where the regulator successfully challenges and reprimands undesirable behaviour. However, the fines do not appear to really address the issues of insider trading or market manipulation. We need to have a plea bargaining arrangement, where the guilty can mitigate punishment by blowing the whistle on others, to further address these issues.”
September’s ban against short selling of shares in several UK banks – still in operation – is another FSA move to stymie suspected market abuse. Despite political talk of ‘spivs in suits’, this action is not aimed at individual abusers but rather at a long-established form of speculation within the financial system.
“Action should not have been taken unilaterally against short selling, but instead against those individuals spreading rumours to drive the price of stocks down. In short, don't penalise short sellers but instead arrest or fine the market manipulators,” says Blair-Ford.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules