Madoff feeder fund accused of fraud and deception
NEW YORK - Hedge fund Fairfield Greenwich is facing charges of lying to investors over the Madoff fraud. The fund, founded by socialite Walter Noel, was reported to have had a $7 billion exposure to Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme. Now it is facing a civil fraud complaint from Massachusetts secretary of state William Galvin alleging that it misled investors over due diligence performed on Madoff's collapsed scheme. Galvin - the top Massachusetts state regulator - says his office had tried to discern how Fairfield could not have discovered the fraud during its 18-year relationship with Madoff. Galvin said: "The answer is that they were blinded by fees, did not engage in meaningful due diligence and turned a blind eye to any fact that would have burst their lucrative bubble."
The fund released a statement in response to the regulator's accusations, calling them in turns sensational, false and misleading. Fairfield says the complaint is "based on nothing more than 20:20 hindsight" but fails to arrive at an accurate understanding of the facts and contains several inaccuracies in its version of events. The fund alludes to the fact that if the Securities and Exchange Commission, other US regulators and thousands of investors could be successfully hoodwinked by Madoff, then there is no reason to suggest that Fairfield could have done better to detect what it calls "his sophisticated fraud".
Fairfield allegedly told clients that it conducted daily monitoring of its holdings and risk profiles. The fund received information from Madoff three to five days after he allegedly conducted trades for the funds. Fairfield is the first feeder fund to face regulatory action linked to the Madoff fraud. It was rapidly revealed to be the most heavily exposed fund to the swindle after Madoff handed himself into regulators in December, claiming his investment fund was "one big lie". He subsequently pleaded guilty to fraud charges in March. Fairfield says it will vigorously contest the complaint.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie