Fidelity National faces suit for negligence
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA - A lawsuit has been filed against Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), a large transaction processor and outsourcer to the financial services sector, and its subsidiary check verification firm, Certegy Check Services, concerning the alleged compromise of personal data.
The complaint, filed at the central district of California on behalf of 8.5 million customers, does not seek damages but accuses the defendants of negligence, invasion of privacy and breach of implied contract.
Both companies are charged with the failure to implement and maintain adequate security measures for protecting confidential financial information belonging to consumers.
They are also accused of failing to properly monitor and supervise the activities of employees entrusted with consumer data.
The breach in question, disclosed by FIS in July, involved a Certegy senior database administrator who illegally accessed and downloaded millions of consumer records and sold them to data brokers. Los Angeles-based resident Theodore Borreson first brought the case when he noticed an influx of direct marketing and promotional offers. The defendants are accused of failing to notify customers immediately of the breach.
Proving a direct link between data theft and identity theft or fraud is difficult and in the past has usually deterred victims from taking legal action against the firm in question.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision