Fidelity National faces suit for negligence
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA - A lawsuit has been filed against Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), a large transaction processor and outsourcer to the financial services sector, and its subsidiary check verification firm, Certegy Check Services, concerning the alleged compromise of personal data.
The complaint, filed at the central district of California on behalf of 8.5 million customers, does not seek damages but accuses the defendants of negligence, invasion of privacy and breach of implied contract.
Both companies are charged with the failure to implement and maintain adequate security measures for protecting confidential financial information belonging to consumers.
They are also accused of failing to properly monitor and supervise the activities of employees entrusted with consumer data.
The breach in question, disclosed by FIS in July, involved a Certegy senior database administrator who illegally accessed and downloaded millions of consumer records and sold them to data brokers. Los Angeles-based resident Theodore Borreson first brought the case when he noticed an influx of direct marketing and promotional offers. The defendants are accused of failing to notify customers immediately of the breach.
Proving a direct link between data theft and identity theft or fraud is difficult and in the past has usually deterred victims from taking legal action against the firm in question.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage
UK securitisation reforms trump EU’s, say market players
Originators and investors could find UK securitised assets easier to deal with after tandem reviews