UK consults on Rome I Regulation
The UK ministry of Justice has issued a consultation paper on the UK’s decision to opt into EU contract law Rome I
LONDON – The UK Ministry of Justice has published a consultation paper (CP) that seeks views on whether the UK should opt in to the proposed Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) and, if so, whether the Rome I rules should apply throughout the UK. When the draft EU legislation first emerged in December 2005, UK business leaders were up in arms as they believed that Rome I threatened to seriously undermine the financial services sector and damage online businesses, and has the potential to become a legal compliance nightmare.
Rome I, which the European Commission claims simply enshrines into European law the policies set out in the 1980 Rome Convention, sets out the rules to determine the applicable laws of contract in cross-border trade. However, the draft legislation contained substantial amendments to the Rome Convention that could have serious and wide-ranging ramifications for cross-border trade.
Under the draft proposal, a UK firm selling its goods and services to consumers across the EU would no longer be secure in the knowledge that it is broadly governed by English law. Instead it would have to navigate a minefield of up to 27 different, often conflicting legal regimes – or, more likely, opt not to do business outside the UK.
Following consultation with UK stakeholders in 2006, the UK government decided to engage in the negotiations but not opt in to the proposal. The Council and the European Parliament agreed the text of Rome I in December 2007 and the CP states that Rome I will be formally adopted this year and its substantive provisions will come into force 18 months later.
The provisions in the original proposal that were of greatest concern to UK stakeholders during negotiations have either been removed, substantially revised or returned to their Rome Convention form subject to later review. In the case of those provisions subject to review, future amendments will not automatically bind the UK. In light of this, the UK government's preliminary conclusion is that the UK should now opt in to Rome I and apply similar rules to contracts connected to two or more jurisdictions within the UK. But the government wishes to test this conclusion by seeking views from stakeholders. The closing date for responses to the consultation paper is June 25, 2008. www.justice.gov.uk/docs/cp0508.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura