Merrill Lynch fined $1 million for conflicts of interest; BoA picks up the tab
Another loss for Bank of America as Merrill is penalised for unfair practices
NEW YORK - Merrill Lynch has been fined $1 million by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fine is for violating securities law and failing to disclose conflicts of interests when recommending its own consulting services to pensions clients.
The US regulator issued the penalty somewhat belatedly, as Merrill Lynch was purchased by rival Bank of America as of January 1, 2009. Merrill sustained a $15.3 billion loss for 2008 - compounded by early bonus payments of $4 billion - causing Bank of America to seek $20 billion recapitalisation and $118 billion in asset guarantees from the US Treasury last month. Bank of America is understood to have paid as much as $50 billion to buy Merrill.
The SEC complaint says Merrill failed to disclose its conflict of interest for advising clients to use directed brokerage services, thereby causing their money managers to conduct trades through Merrill - formerly Wall Street's largest brokerage. The regulator said Merrill and its consultants "could and often did receive significantly higher revenue" as a result of the unfair practices.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation