APRA outlines Basel II market risk proposals
Plan to mesh credit and market risk elements
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its proposed approach to the treatment of market risk under Basel II.
APRA has released a discussion paper, draft prudential standard and a prudential practice guide that set out proposed refinements to APRA’s current approach to market risk for authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADI).The proposed approach is designed to better align ADI market risk capital requirements with Basel II, but preserves APRA’s requirement that ADIs have in place a framework to measure, manage, and monitor market risk commensurate with the nature, scale and complexity of their operations.
As is currently the case, under the proposed rule an ADI must use the standard method of market risk measurement or obtain APRA’s approval to use its own risk measurement model. APRA also requires an ADI using the advanced approaches to measuring credit risk and operational risk to hold regulatory capital against its interest rate risk in the banking book.
The refinements were guided by the need to bring existing capital requirements into line with the market risk principles in the Basel framework and to ensure consistency with the revisions for credit risk under Basel II, according to APRA chairman John Laker.
“These amendments recognise the rapid expansion in the range and volume of instruments traded and potential changes in ADIs’ market risk profiles on their trading and non-trading books.”
The suite of Basel II prudential standards for credit, market and operational risk is expected to be finalised in the second half of 2007, with Basel II set to come into force in Australia on January 1 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche
Big banks look to XVA desks to crush counterparty exposures
Risk Benchmarking: Two-thirds of global dealers run routine optimisation, compared with just 13% of smaller players