UK's FSA fines Credit Suisse £5.6 million for control failings
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has hit investment bank Credit Suisse with a £5.6 million fine for systems and controls failings. The FSA said the Swiss bank's London-based subsidiary had failed to conduct its operations with due care and diligence, breaching the regulator's Principles 2 and 3 by failing to organise and control its business effectively.
The fine is not the largest the regulator has administered but comes closely after the £4 million fine imposed on Winterflood securities for market abuse in July. Seen together with an increasingly proactive enforcement of UK mortgage industry standards, it points to something of a clampdown by the regulator. "The penalty reflects our tougher stance on enforcement and our policy of imposing higher penalties to achieve credible deterrence," says Margaret Cole, director of FSA enforcement.
Credit Suisse announced on February 19 that it had identified mis-marking and pricing errors by a number of traders. The resulting re-pricing of asset-backed securities wrote down $2.65 billion in revenues, only a week after the bank released its annual results for 2007.
The errors took place in the bank's structured credit group within its investment banking division. The bank broke the FSA's Principles 2 and 3 by failing to adequately supervise the business of the unit, not acting promptly once pricing concerns were identified, and failing to implement adequate systems or controls, allowing positions to remain wrongly valued for five months. The bank has since initiated a comprehensive review of systems and controls, and implemented remedial measures.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI