Crackdown on fraud against elderly continues
In its continuing crackdown on investment fraudsters targeting senior citizens, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has started emergency enforcement proceedings against a fraudulent offering of stock in One Wall Street, a New York-based company.
In its complaint filed in the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn, the Commission alleges that One Wall Street and its principals have illegally obtained over $1.6 million from at least 64 investors, most of them senior citizens.
The action charges defendants One Wall Street, Donte Jarvis, Alan Brown, Willis 'Bill' White III and Cecil Baptiste with making fraudulent solicitations and misappropriating investor funds.
The complaint alleges that from March 2003 until the present, the defendants raised at least $1.6 million from at least 64 investors - mostly senior citizens - who purchased unregistered One Wall Street stock.
The defendants are alleged to have misled investors that One Wall Street would imminently conduct an initial public offering (IPO), that E*Trade Financial Corporation was negotiating to merge with One Wall Street, and that One Wall Street would use the investment proceeds for solely business purposes.
However, the defendants have not pursued an IPO of One Wall Street, E*Trade has never engaged in any business discussions with One Wall Street whatsoever, nor did One Wall Street use investor proceeds in the manner the defendants represented.
The SEC seeks temporary restraining orders against further violations of the federal securities laws, asset freezes, and accountings.
The regulator has recently focused on investment fraud targeted at the elderly, aligning its enforcement arena, oversight operations and inspections to the growing problem.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions