Crackdown on fraud against elderly continues
In its continuing crackdown on investment fraudsters targeting senior citizens, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has started emergency enforcement proceedings against a fraudulent offering of stock in One Wall Street, a New York-based company.
In its complaint filed in the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn, the Commission alleges that One Wall Street and its principals have illegally obtained over $1.6 million from at least 64 investors, most of them senior citizens.
The action charges defendants One Wall Street, Donte Jarvis, Alan Brown, Willis 'Bill' White III and Cecil Baptiste with making fraudulent solicitations and misappropriating investor funds.
The complaint alleges that from March 2003 until the present, the defendants raised at least $1.6 million from at least 64 investors - mostly senior citizens - who purchased unregistered One Wall Street stock.
The defendants are alleged to have misled investors that One Wall Street would imminently conduct an initial public offering (IPO), that E*Trade Financial Corporation was negotiating to merge with One Wall Street, and that One Wall Street would use the investment proceeds for solely business purposes.
However, the defendants have not pursued an IPO of One Wall Street, E*Trade has never engaged in any business discussions with One Wall Street whatsoever, nor did One Wall Street use investor proceeds in the manner the defendants represented.
The SEC seeks temporary restraining orders against further violations of the federal securities laws, asset freezes, and accountings.
The regulator has recently focused on investment fraud targeted at the elderly, aligning its enforcement arena, oversight operations and inspections to the growing problem.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage