Banks using ‘discretion’ to report loan losses
Regulators tolerate less standardised reporting during industry weakness
Financial regulators are allowing banks to use their own discretion in reporting loan losses during periods of industry weakness to temporarily preserve financial stability, a new report has claimed.
A working paper from the Bank for International Settlements entitled Regulatory discretion and banks’ pursuit of “safety in similarity”, found that institutions: “may be permitted to exercise more discretion in their reporting of charge-offs when the banking system is weaker than when the problem is more isolated”.
“Such discretion has the desired effect of at least temporarily preserving financial stability and it may also encourage banks to cluster to gain ‘safety in similarity’. Whether more clustering adds to financial stability is an open question,” the report charges.
The study looked at the annual charge-offs and provisions for loan losses for the 30 largest US banks between 1979 and 2005, and worked off the hypothesis that: “bank regulators grant banks more discretion in reporting charge-offs when the system is weaker” while they are “likely to be less generous with the reporting discretion options that they confer…when the industry is stronger.”
Researchers also found that risk-taking behaviour among banks is largely determined by the behaviour of peer banks and that the ‘clustering’ observed in loss reporting extends into risk appetites.
“In addition we [found] that individual banks detectably change their risk-taking to make it more like that of other banks during periods when the banking industry is weaker,” the paper concludes.
The full report can be found on the Bank for International Settlements’ website: www.bis.org.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos