Fraud in the UK hits twelve year high
A new KPMG report reveals fraud is rife in the UK though banks are faring well
LONDON – Fraud reached its highest level in 12 years in the UK last year – costing £1 billion – according to a new study by financial accountants KPMG. This figure includes fraud against all types of industries, including the government.
The report reveals fears that recent financial turmoil and increasing pressure on the industry may increase the risk of fraud, as well as the discovery of it. More people may attempt to ease personal financial burdens by turning to fraud. At the same time, firms are scrutinising operations and collectively belt-tightening—meaning that they will be more likely to uncover existing frauds.
As the debris clears from last month’s rogue trader fraud at French bank Société Générale (SG), there is some comparatively good news for UK banks, with only £37 million worth of fraudulent transactions directed at them for 2007—down from £140 million in 2006—and little change in the level of insider fraud.
But the survey found that fraudsters are also increasingly sophisticated, with 90% of frauds carried out by organised crime gangs and only 197 cases brought to court – down from 277 in 2006.
“Levels of fraud continue to remain disturbingly high. Organised gangs have been more active than ever, with a proliferation in VAT frauds, ID thefts and other forms of white collar crime,” said Hitesh Patel, a partner at KPMG Forensic.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption