Ex-Deutsche executives seek £5m from property deal
LONDON – In mid-March, two former Deutsche Bank executives took their former employer to the High Court in London. They alleged that the investment bank had not given them their share of the profits from a £340 million property deal seven years ago.
Paul Rivlin and Neil Lawson-May are suing the bank for alleged breach of contract. They say the terms of their bonus plan entitled them to a percentage share of the profit the bank made on the transaction. Deutsche says the allegation lacks merit, and that the men were both paid more than £1 million in salary and bonuses in 2000, and were not entitled to further payments.
The transaction involved the establishment of a joint venture with the Italian utility firm Enel. Although the two men claim they introduced the deal to the firm the bank says they did not initiate the transaction.
In a statement, the bank said: "Deutsche Bank recognises and rewards real contribution by its employees to its business. In this case, the claimants did not contribute real value to the transaction, nor did they satisfy the relevant criteria."
The two men have since left the firm. They are hoping to win £5 million in compensation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules