CEBS consultation on commodities businesses reveals risk areas
CEBS also releases a preliminary document on large-exposure regimes
A consultation by a group of EU banking supervisors on issues arising from trade in commodities has identified market, operational, legal and liquidity risk as possible problem areas.
The Committee of European Banking Supervisors’ (CEBS) consultation, published on June 15, also said that no generalisations can be made regarding systemic risk.
CEBS said: “Systemic risk crystallises through contagion transmitted via market participants' direct and indirect interdependencies. While the perceived interconnections may give rise to systemic risk concerns, their extent may depend on the size of the respective markets for commodities or exotic derivatives, relative to the wider financial market or the related industry.”
The report is a response to the EU Commission’s request, made in August 2006, for the organisation to assess commodities risk. CEBS has also stated that counterparty credit quality should not matter when assessing the level of risk involved in large exposures.
The Committee said: “CEBS’s preliminary view is that, given the nature of unforeseen event risk, counterparty creditworthiness should not be reflected in these limits.”
The statement coincides with the committee’s announcement on June 15 that it would begin a public consultation on the regulation of large exposures. The consultation will consider issues such as the importance of counterparty credit quality and the 800% aggregate large-exposures limit.
It has released a preliminary document detailing the CEBS’s stance on some of the most important concepts involved in the large-exposures regime. The committee has invited the public to submit comments up until August 15.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs
The race to model private market risks
BlackRock maps holdings to risk factors; competitors aim to get the best from statistical methods
G-Sib capital surcharge: how indexing and averaging alter incentives
Capital risk strategist anticipates Basel III endgame impact on US big-bank behaviour
Doubts linger over start date for 24-hour US stock trading
NSCC will be ready in June, but questions remain over corporate actions and circuit breakers