The Bear Stearns Blues continue
NEW YORK - Shareholders at Bear Stearns are still counting the cost of its shock sell-off to JP Morgan. Outrage from Bear Stearns staff over the Fed-brokered secret deal swiftly led rival JP Morgan to issue a five-fold rise of the initial $2 share price offered to $10 to stave off legal action. Bear Stearns' 14,150 directors and employees are understood to own 38.7% of the bank's shares. The revised deal values Wall Street's fifth-largest investment bank at around $2.1 billion, compared to $236 million under the first offer.
The new offer is still 88% down on share price last month - representing a loss for the bank's shareholder staff of about $3 billion. Freefalling subprime stock, compounded by the credit draught, took the 85-year-old Bear Stearns to the brink of bankruptcy. Other big losers are UK billionaire Joe Lewis, who bought 11 million shares in the firm last year, chairman James Cayne who reportedly owns 5.6 million shares in the bank, and chief executive Alan Schwartz who owns a further 1.03 million shares. The sale was co-ordinated with the US Federal Reserve, which gave approval after helping to provide $200 million emergency funding to Bear Stearns only days before. The Fed has agreed to provide credit for up to $30 billion of Bear Stearns' struggling assets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs