Four in five firms hit by fraud, says survey
Four in five businesses have been hit by fraud over the past three years, says a new Kroll worldwide survey commissioned for the Economist Intelligence Unit
NEW YORK – One in 10 companies loses more than $100 million a year to fraud, according to the report released on Monday. In some sectors, such as health care and financial services, almost a quarter of firms lost at least $1 million. The survey, by risk consultants Kroll for the Economist Intelligence Unit, also says 81% of businesses think their risk exposure to fraud has increased. The survey found the average annual cost to a company with revenues of more than $5 billion was more than $20 million. These figures come after a glut of financial crime and data loss incidents this summer.
More than 800 senior executives across 10 industries were questioned and 34% of them admitted to theft of assets or stock. A fifth of those surveyed also revealed financial mismanagement, information theft, self-dealing, internal financial fraud, procurement fraud, bribery and corruption. Corruption and bribery accounted for 9% of all fraud in North America and 14% in western Europe. In eastern Europe and Latin America this rose to 29%, with 39% in Africa and the Middle East.
A third of companies said the increase in fraudulent incidents was due to high staff turnover. “The risks of fraud for business are greater today than in the past,” says Andres Antonius, president of Kroll's Consulting Services Group. Technology firms are among the worst hit – 31% of those surveyed blamed IT complexity for the fraud they experienced. Kroll highlights new technologies, investors, expansion into international markets and increased collaboration between companies as having contributed to the increased risk of exposure to fraud.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules