Concrete steps taken on international regulation
Basel Committee chairman confirms it is taking concrete steps towards strengthening global regulation of the banking sector
BRUSSELS - Nout Wellink, chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and president of the Netherlands Bank, highlighted in a speech that concrete steps were being taken by the committee to strengthen the global regulation of the banking sector.
Speaking before the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Wellink noted that "supervisors must have a comprehensive strategy to deal with the crisis and the associated impact on banks. This is essential if we are to restore stability to our financial systems and economies".
The Basel Committee's current and planned initiatives are intended to produce a more robust supervisory and regulatory framework for the banking sector. These efforts, which are also in support of the initiatives and recommendations of the Financial Stability Forum and the G20 leaders, include: better coverage of banks' risk exposures, including for trading book, securitisation and derivative activities; more and higher quality capital to back these exposures; counter-cyclical capital buffers and provisions that can be built up in good times and drawn down in stress; the introduction of a non-risk based measure to supplement Basel II and help contain leverage in the banking system; higher liquidity buffers; stronger risk management and governance standards; more regulatory focus on system-wide or "macroprudential" supervision; and greater transparency about the risk in banks' portfolios.
In discussing the Basel Committee's long-term strategy, Wellink stated that "we need to establish a clear target for the future regulatory system that substantially reduces both the probability and severity of a crisis like the one we currently are working through". He added that "by providing clarity about the future regulatory framework, we will help re-establish near-term confidence, reduce the risk of competitive distortions and limit the degrees of uncertainty for the public and private sector".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Appetite breaches climb for top op risks
Risk Benchmarking: Low tolerance and heightened threat environment combine to test banks’ limits for cyber, resilience, third-party risk
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs
The race to model private market risks
BlackRock maps holdings to risk factors; competitors aim to get the best from statistical methods
G-Sib capital surcharge: how indexing and averaging alter incentives
Capital risk strategist anticipates Basel III endgame impact on US big-bank behaviour