No more investment banks, says SEC
The SEC has announced the failure of its investment banking supervision and an end to its consolidated supervised entities regime
WASHINGTON, DC – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced the end of its consolidated supervised entities (CSE) programme of voluntary supervision – effectively spelling the end of investment banks on Wall Street.
In parallel press releases, the US regulator has accepted the failure of voluntary regulation of investment bank holding companies, concluding an investigation by its inspector-general in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse in March 2008.
SEC chairman Christopher Cox says: “The past six months have made it abundantly clear that voluntary regulation does not work. When Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, it created a significant regulatory gap by failing to give the SEC or any agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies, like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns.
“The inspector-general of the SEC today released a report on the CSE programme's supervision of Bear Stearns, and that report validates and echoes the concerns I have expressed to Congress. The report's major findings are ultimately derivative of the lack of specific legal authority for the SEC or any other agency to act as the regulator of these large investment bank holding companies.”
The SEC announcement represents something of a fait accompli. Bear Stearns, the first to fall of the ‘big five’ investment banks, was sold to JP Morgan Chase on March 16. Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy protection on September 15, the same day Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America. Both surviving dedicated investment banks – Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs –applied for status as ordinary (regulated) banks on September 21.
The statement by SEC chairman Cox can be downloaded from the following link.
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-230.htm
And the report into the demise of Bear Stearns can be downloaded from the link below.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive