メインコンテンツに移動

Regulators question human-in-the-loop as AI governance tool

Bank of England and Iosco executives suggest it’s more important to retain overall accountability

科学者風の女性が、ホログラフィックなAIの脳の前でクリップボードを確認しています

Inserting human oversight of individual outputs is an inadequate way to manage the risks of deploying generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), regulators have warned. Instead, financial institutions must allocate responsibility for the integrity of the entire process where GenAI is used, as they would for processes carried out before the new technology was deployed.

“I think human-in-the-loop is

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here