China needs an RMB liquidity absorber – HK might be the answer
Increasing HKMA’s CNH debt issuance could help cement renminbi’s role in financial markets
Surging international use of the renminbi to clear trade payments has not had a supportive impact on the currency. In fact, it has had quite the opposite effect.
Since last year, Russia has adopted RMB for payments with non-Chinese third parties as a means to bypass Western sanctions. Elsewhere, countries such as Saudi Arabia and Brazil have also agreed to begin using the redback to clear payments for their oil and agricultural product trades with China.
But despite the growing number of sovereign entities and other institutions using RMB as a settlement currency, the redback still has a long way to go to become a genuine store of value.
Overseas, it exists mainly in the form of interbank liquidity, not in the form of bank deposits. And herein lies a problem for the People’s Bank of China – as well as an opportunity for Hong Kong and its de-facto central bank.
Institutions receiving RMB from Chinese counterparties currently have a dearth of options to deploy it in ways that recycle it back to the RMB market. More often than not, it will end up being converted to other currencies. That effectively creates a supply of RMB offshore that can result in some short-term depreciation pressures on the currency. So, even amid its growing adoption internationally this past year, the yuan has – ironically – been one of Asia’s worst performing currencies over the same period.
A stronger, deeper offshore investment market through which RMB overseas can be invested in offshore RMB assets is also needed.
International investment in China’s onshore bond market has been growing rapidly in recent years through the Bond Connect and the China Interbank Bond Market (CIBM Direct) schemes. And the launch of Swap Connect, which offers international investors better tools to hedge RMB interest rate risks, is expected to further bolster growth in onshore investment.
But a stronger, deeper offshore investment market through which RMB overseas can be invested in offshore RMB (CNH) assets is also needed.
For while a growing number of institutions – from sovereign wealth funds to corporates – are using RMB, there remains some cautiousness around China’s onshore market, given the current frictions between the West and China. Many institutions still prefer to stay offshore.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has issued offshore renminbi (CNH) denominated debt on an irregular basis in recent years. A three-year CNH note here, a five-year note there. Yet banks report that the book demand on some of the HKMA’s recent CNH issuances have been multiple times what was being targeted.
Perhaps a regular schedule of CNH issuances, akin to the HKMA’s own Exchange Fund Bills & Notes Programme, could soak up all that additional, growing demand for triple-A-rated CNH assets.
Building a liquid benchmark yield curve through such an initiative could boost the development of the CNH bond market. And it would also better support China’s currency by helping in the recycling of RMB deposits accumulating overseas back into RMB assets – playing the same role US Treasuries do in the Eurodollar market. The HKMA’s issuances would become China’s offshore liquidity absorber.
The HKMA may not have a pressing financial need to ramp up issuances of CNH debt right now. Despite budget deficits in the past two years, it continues to maintain a very sizable residual surplus.
But if Hong Kong wants to cement its position as the dominant offshore RMB centre at a time when international RMB use is growing rapidly, this is certainly something worthy of consideration.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
銀行システムを「換気」する時期が来たのか?
監視団体は基準の引き下げを懸念していますが、政策立案者は成長に注目しており、彼らは難しいジレンマに直面しています。
なぜ破綻処理計画を骨抜きにするのは良くないのか
銀行の破綻は避けられないものですが、銀行危機はそうではありません
日本の「大還流」?急速なリパトリは期待できない
GPIFによる米国債から日本国債への切り替えは段階的に行われる見通しであり、これはヘッジファンドにとってさらなる悪材料となる可能性があります
AIエージェントが、信頼できないスタッフのような存在である理由
GenAIシステムに内在する不確実性により、リスク管理担当者はより対立的なアプローチをとらざるを得ません
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています