メインコンテンツに移動

Banks claim front-office content is safe from Mifid II

Work of ‘desk analysts’ is not research, banks argue; lawyers are not so sure

Need a workaround?
A surmountable obstacle? Lawyers remain unconvinced of the validity of any workaround

Dealers are seeking to create a firewall around the content produced within their sales and trading businesses, to protect it from incoming European rules that require research to be paid for separately. The argument is that this material – such as commentary on market flows, proprietary data, or trade ideas – is distinct from research in a variety of ways.

Some lawyers are not convinced this

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here