Skip to main content

New CLO charges for insurers miss tail risks, critics say

Revisions to US capital rules underestimate correlations within loan pools and across CLO portfolios, some argue

A yellow warning traffic cone sits on top of a pile of coins

Late in June, after four years of deliberation, US insurance regulators agreed changes to the capital rules for insurers when they invest in collateralised loan obligations (CLOs).

Industry players have followed the dry, technical back-and-forth that led to this decision closely, and for good reason. The review of CLO charges marks the first step by the National Association of Insurance

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here