Analysts close to disasters make better calls, study claims
Gloomy forecasts from those traumatised by nearby events give quirky demonstration of behavioural bias
Past studies have shown surprising influences on sell-side analysts’ calls, from the weather to national pride to stubbornness. The latest in the line is as quirky as any, suggesting that physical proximity to traumatic events can make analysts more pessimistic – but also more accurate.
Carina Cuculiza and Alok Kumar at the University of Miami, and Constantinos Antoniou and Anastasios Maligkris at Warwick Business School, studied sell-side analysts’ earnings forecasts for US companies between
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Investing
The race to build hyper-personalised investing
Direct indexing is taking off, but how far can it scale?
NAIC cracks down on risky feeder funds
Vehicles have been used by insurers to invest in ‘weird and wonderful’ assets, say practitioners
Quants are using language models to map what causes what
GPT-4 does a surprisingly good job of separating causation from correlation
NAIC softens its rating overhaul. Insurers still don’t like it
Insurers worry that the regulatory body could override credit ratings without sufficient explanation
Looser loan terms clear way for more ‘c-on-c violence’
Creditor-on-creditor fighting likely to build, as carve-outs for struggling borrowers get wider
EU reporting regime a ‘hurdle’ for risk transfer deals, say investors
Onerous disclosure templates could deter US banks from marketing synthetic securitisations to European buyers
The quants who kicked the hornets’ nest – to champion causality
A small but influential cadre says the multi-trillion-dollar factor investing industry is based on flawed science
LDI managers disagree on credit collateralised gilt repo
BlackRock and Schroders execute first trades, but others favour different ways to source liquidity
Most read
- Quants are using language models to map what causes what
- Reluctantly, CME moves to clear US Treasuries
- The bank quant who wants to stop gen AI hallucinating