Evaluating social criteria in fundamental and thematic investment portfolios

Lydia Harvey

The “S” pillar has trailed the “E” and “G” pillars in terms of integration within modern ESG approaches; it could even be described as suffering from “middle child syndrome”. Compared to governance topics that are closer in spirit to traditional financial analysis, and environmental topics that are underpinned by scientific consensus, investors to date have struggled to incorporate social topics into financial analysis.

However, social issues can present very real risks to companies and the consequences of failing to properly manage material social issues can involve significant financial costs and reputational damages. Examples of social failures include exploiting workers in a supply chain, mismanaging customer data or failing to meet product safety standards. While these impacts are not immediately captured within a company’s financial statements, there are several ways in which they may cause material financial costs, including regulatory implications (fines, taxes, etc), operational disruptions and reputational damages.

Managing social issues well not only reduces the level of risk a company faces but may also contribute positively to improved reputation and even

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here