Clarity call for trade repository reporting

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

Stewart Macbeth, chief executive, DTCC Deriv/Serv
We understand the format of the data we will receive as a trade repository, but additional clarity is needed regarding exactly how the content will be specified and how market participants send it. With respect to counterparty codes, our understanding is that the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma) is looking at three options: a legal entity identifier (LEI); an interim identifier; or a business identifier code (BIC). Esma is looking

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]