Skip to main content

Most banks stick to tried-and-trusted XVA models

Black Scholes- and Heath-Jarrow-Morton-based approaches dominate, with some exploring Copulas for wrong-way risk, post-Archegos

This piece is part of a series benchmarking bank XVA management practices. Risk Management subscribers can view selected cuts of the underlying data here.

Most dealers’ valuation adjustments (XVA) desks rely on a single dominant approach to modelling valuation adjustments within each asset class, the findings of Risk.net’s inaugural XVA Benchmarking research suggest.

Interest rate modelling is

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here