Content funding on Risk.net
Content quality is at the heart of Risk.net’s success. We employ an editorial team of 40 around the globe who are proud of the reputation we have built for objective, in-depth reporting of complex topics.
We often receive enquiries from third parties operating in the markets we cover, who want to align themselves with our quality content. This is natural and forms part of any commercial publisher’s operation. We aim to be fully transparent with our readers, so will always label this content in one of two ways.
Supported by
This content is editorially independent, but has been funded – or part-funded – by a third party that wants to align itself with a subject. This label may appear on an article, a topic, or a section of the site.
In some cases, funding is accepted for work that is already underway; in others, it is accepted for new projects. The funder may suggest topics for coverage, but the relevant commissioning editor is under no obligation to accept those suggestions. The suitability of any funder must first be approved by the editor-in-chief.
The content is written and edited by Risk.net journalists, or those we have approved, using the same processes and standards applied to the rest of our journalism. Risk.net does not show this content to funders for approval.
Sponsor content
This material is paid for by the third party and is produced without the involvement of Risk.net’s editorial team – sometimes it will be written by the third party, and sometimes by a freelance journalist at the direction of the third party. Traditionally, these pieces are known as ‘sponsored statements’ or ‘advertorials’.
All sponsor content is clearly labelled, so any reader of Risk.net can easily distinguish between a piece written by our editorial team and a piece written by a sponsor, in accordance with guidelines set by the Advertising Standards Authority (UK) and the Federal Trade Commission (US).
The acceptance of both ‘supported by’ and ‘sponsor content’ in no way affects our editorial position. Our editorial team works independently from our commercial team, and is free to challenge the activities of companies and organisations that are also our advertisers and sponsors.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Few banks formally evaluate GenAI human-in-the-loop controls
Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs and challengers use tools to test controls efficacy; others rely on judgement
From gatekeeper to coach: model risk bids to reinvent itself
Model Risk Benchmarking data reveals a function in flux, grappling with resource cuts, AI models, regulatory divergence
CFTC backs clearing exemption for risk reduction runs
CCP sources concerned about switch to bilateral trades, as other regulators also soften rules
0DTE options and non-banks could accelerate market risk
Risk Live: Risk managers warn trading desks in “uncharted territory” with shocks moving faster
Anthropic curbs and cost fears spur banks to shop around for AI
Risk Live: Banks increasingly wary of reliance on US models amid uncertain geopolitical environment and mounting costs
Risk managers want closer relationship with first line
Risk Live: New risks emerging at speed means deep division between lines of defence is dangerous
AI agents could become credit risk managers… almost
Risk Live: Bankers say credit stress-testing could be automated, but humans remain accountable
Risk Technology Awards 2026: Real-time reality
Industry trying to improve on periodic risk reporting – but it’s not easy