Exchange innovation of the year: CME Group

Risk Awards 2017: Patience pays off with spectacular success of Ultra 10 Treasury futures

Sean Tully, CME Group: “There was a lot of outreach to the market about what is the best design"

The opportunity was clear. With the cost to banks of holding US Treasuries increasing, market participants have been looking for a liquid, capital-light way to maintain constant rate exposure. CME recognised the potential for a futures contract that would exactly match the economics of on-the-run 10-year Treasury notes – in fact, it spotted the gap two years ago, but instead of rushing a product to market, it launched an extensive consultation with market participants on product design.

That patience is paying off. Since its launch on January 10, 2016, CME's Ultra 10 US Treasury Note future has surpassed expectations, becoming the most successful product launch in the exchange's history as measured by average daily volume, open interest and number of participants.

"With the advent of balance sheet and capital constraints, and in particular the declining repo market, the industry was looking for a new Treasury future that would pinpoint the 10-year point on the curve," says Sean Tully, senior managing director of financial products and over-the-counter products at CME Group. "There was a lot of outreach to the market about what is the best design, and a very careful launch. There's been a huge uptake."

As of January 17, it had traded more than 17.9 million contracts and $1.2 trillion in notional value, with nearly 300,000 contracts in open interest. In December 2016, average daily volume was more than 87,000 contracts. On December 15 alone, it traded more than 186,000 contracts.

The futures allow for delivery of original issue 10-year US Treasury notes with remaining terms to maturity at delivery of at least nine years, five months and not more than 10 years. By comparison, CME's existing 10-Year US Treasury Note product allows for delivery of notes with a remaining term to maturity of at least six and a half years, but not more than 10 years, from the first day of the delivery month. The stricter duration criteria ensure a more precise replication of 10-year cash Treasury exposure.

Positive feedback

User feedback has been overwhelmingly positive: "Ultra 10 is an extremely important product," says a senior fixed-income derivatives trader at a large asset manager. "It's become an important part of the futures complex. We use the Ultra 10 extensively, as do other market participants. The Treasury futures that trade on CBOT [CME's Chicago Board of Trade] are more liquid than cash Treasuries because of their infrastructure, liquidity providers and electronic trading. People use Treasury futures to transfer risk, whether they're hedging or adding to risk based on their outlook."

"Our experience with CME is we have found them to be a great partner. CME has worked with the industry on new products, on being inclusive," agrees the head of futures at one large bank.

The development process for the Ultra 10s was painstaking – in a July 2015 webinar that drew some 500 attendees, CME Group pitched three contract designs it was considering, following up with individual company meetings.

"We let the industry know we were going to spend the next several months getting their feedback on the three different designs," Tully says. "We held more than 100 individual client meetings. The clear design was the one we eventually launched, which has a cheapest-to-deliver basket of nine years, five months up to 10 years."

Tully says there has been no cannibalisation of the existing contract by the Ultra 10, though; in fact, the bourse sees the two contracts as complementary, with interest in its classic 10-Year Treasury Note futures continuing to grow in aggregate since the launch of the Ultra 10s – evidence of the growing role for futures as dealers pull back from the cash Treasuries market. In 2011 and 2012, average daily volume of CME's Treasury futures was running between 55% and 60% of the cash Treasuries market. Today, that figure is close to 80%.

"You can see much greater penetration over the past five years among hedge funds, asset managers, banks and proprietary trading firms," says Tully.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here