IFS calls in receivers, seeks buyer
FX trading technology firm IFS has gone into receivership following an unproductive takeover of Dene International and a drop in sales of its flagship product, a spokesperson for the firm said.
"It was a shock to many people, but the capital markets have changed a lot in a short time. We have seen a lot of cutbacks and the focus is going back to profitability," said an IFS spokesperson.
Sources said that last year’s purchase of fellow FX technology firm Dene International was the catalyst that led to IFS’s problems. Following the takeover, IFS found itself supporting an additional 30 staff but projected revenues failed to materialise, these sources claimed. The companies demerged in March, but IFS was left with a large number of staff and a drop in sales of MarginMan.
Around 30 positions were axed in May, sources said, but the move was not enough to hold off the receivers.
But IFS remains confident a buyer will soon be found. "We are confident there will be a buyer for the company within weeks and we have seen a high level of interest," the IFS spokesperson said. "We have a large customer base and everyone sees the business as viable."
The spokesperson added that IFS’s customer base had responded well to the news. "We have contacted all MarginMan customers and received a great amount of support in terms of sticking with the company."
IFS had signed agreements to link its products to three multi-bank FX portals, FXall, Currenex and Atriax. An Atriax spokesperson said its agreement with IFS involved no financial commitments. Currenex will also remain unaffected by the situation at IFS, a spokesperson claimed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
CME offers basis traders a leg up
New Treasury Link service ‘levels playing field’ in strategy dominated by high-speed players
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
CTRM software house of the year: Hitachi Energy
Energy Risk Awards 2026: Software developer’s portfolio approach meets changing needs of energy market participants
What is driving the ALM resurgence? Key differentiators and core analytics
The drivers and characteristics of a modern ALM framework or platform
Are EU banks buying cloud from Lidl’s middle aisle?
As European banks seek to diversify from US cloud hyperscalers, a supermarket group is becoming an unlikely new supplier
Inside the company that helped build China’s equity options market
Fintech firm Bachelier Technology on the challenges of creating a trading platform for China’s unique OTC derivatives market
AI ‘lab’ or no, banks triangulate towards a common approach
Survey shows split between firms with and without centralised R&D. In practice, many pursue hybrid path
Everything, everywhere: 15 AI use cases in play, all at once
Research is top AI use case, best execution bottom; no use is universal, and none shunned, says survey