Source of systemic risk varies by region

European, Canadian and UK banks are too big to fail because of their cross-border activities, Chinese and Japanese banks because of their size

Large banks’ systemic risk scores differ significantly across regions, with cross-jurisdictional activity contributing the most for European, Canadian and UK dealers, Risk Quantum analysis shows.

The 2021 cohort of too-big-to-fail institutions received their designations from the Basel Committee using a methodology that averages the scores of five separate systemic risk indicator categories. 

By taking the aggregate scores for each bank before averaging, it’s possible to gauge which indicator

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: