Fed’s Covid scenarios far harsher than latest stress tests
Recession simulations run by the Federal Reserve to gauge banks’ resilience to the coronavirus crisis projected much higher losses than the worst-case scenario used by the agency in its latest round of stress tests.
The severely adverse scenario used in the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests (DFAST), results for which were released yesterday (June 25), projected a peak-to-trough fall in banks’ aggregate Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital requirements of 210 basis points. The three alternate
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Risk Quantum
Regulation
French regulator questions need for share trading equivalence
Esma’s reinterpretation ahead of Brexit reduces need for equivalence system, says AMF official
Receive this by email