How US G-Sibs shrink down at year-end

When assessing the systemic riskiness of US banks, size is one of the most important criteria used by the Federal Reserve. It’s therefore no surprise that the biggest lenders typically shrink at year-end, when systemic risk scores and associated capital surcharges are set, in order to meet their internal objectives. 

But each bank of the eight current US global systemically important banks (G-Sibs) pares down different businesses, to varying degrees, to hit these targets, Risk Quantum analysis

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: