Skip to main content

Judgement-led approach to conduct risk capital draws criticism

The UK prudential banking regulator is considering using predominantly its judgement to determine the level of additional Pillar 2A capital banks must hold to cover conduct risk. Risk management experts respond to the idea

scales

The UK's Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) looks set for a scuffle with the country's biggest banks over its proposal to use mostly "supervisory judgement" to determine how much capital they must put aside for conduct risk.

The methodology, outlined in a PRA consultation paper last month, treats conduct risk separately from non-conduct risk and is aimed at calculating additional Pillar 2A

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here