
Op risk appetite: Do firms have a balanced diet?
A balanced diet?

Financial services firms are still struggling to adequately set and manage operational risk appetite. Although there is no formal requirement under Pillar I of the Basel II Accord for firms to submit a statement of appetite for op risk, under Pillar II regulators are looking for banks to give an indication of their defined appetite and tolerance in this area. If a firm does not set an op risk appetite, it would be very difficult for it to pass the ‘use' test by demonstrating to regulators that
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Operational risk
Regulation
What lies beneath: Nomura’s iceberg balance sheet
Collateral received by the Japanese bank exceeds its total on-balance-sheet assets – does it matter?
Receive this by email