Non-compliant firms will suffer post-Mifid

Firms in countries where the national legislature has not yet transposed Mifid into law face severe competitive disadvantages, says CEPS

BRUSSELS – The Market in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid) comes into force today, but many EU member states have not yet transposed Mifid into national law and risk placing their financial services firms at a considerable disadvantage.

Karel Lannoo, chief executive officer at the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), warns, "member states are short-sighted not to transpose". He argues banks and brokers in member states where implementation is lagging behind will suffer a "huge delay" and be at a "competitive disadvantage" to those in states where the new rules are in place.

Internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy has again attempted to push states along in implementing the new directive. "Mifid is a groundbreaking piece of legislation. It will transform the landscape for the trading of securities and introduce much-needed competition and efficiency… I urge those member states that have not transposed to hurry up – such lack of action will damage their own firms," he says.

Spain, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and the Netherlands are all late in transposing Mifid. Italy managed to transpose at the last minute, as many expected.

Lannoo also warns financial services firms that the implementation of Mifid exposes them to litigation from clients in the area of best execution. Firms in member states where transposition is late are most a risk. “There could be court cases against banks that have not implemented best execution,” he said.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Financial crime and compliance50 2024

The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective

Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk

How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here