
Op risk can learn from Berlin's renaissance

First of all, it confirmed for me the fact that operational risk executives need to buckle down and get to grips with the whole business process concept. Those little boxes with squiggly lines connecting them can be very enlightening. And the proof of the pudding is definitely in the eating – many financial services firms presented, and the successful projects they undertook reduced operational risk, losses and improved financial performance of the business.
This makes me think there may be a place in the operational risk pantheon of approaches – including internal and external data, self-assessments, KRIs and scenarios – for business process analysis and improvement. After all, if the whole point of op risk is to reduce and mitigate losses, then it makes sense to start bolting on methodologies that achieve this aim.
Indeed, the conference made me think more about the future of operational risk and what shape that should take. Berlin, in some ways, was a real metaphor for this internal debate – as a city, it is in the process of reinventing itself after a long and troubled history. Think of everything the 20th century inflicted on it. Operational risk executives have had it pretty easy in comparison.
And today, sparkling new buildings – interesting, stylish buildings – are rising up. I'm no fan of modern architecture but the buildings in Berlin are some of the best I've seen. It's a city reinventing itself, and in a very exciting, dynamic way.
So how does this relate to operational risk? To me, analysing business processes seems the equivalent of analysing the different components of credit or market risk. It makes sense, and the end product should deliver value to the firm.
What other methodologies should operational risk be bringing into its family of disciplines? What else can be bolted on to the current quintuple of approaches – or indeed perhaps substitute or expand upon one of those approaches – to help operational risk evolve? What should the discipline be seeking to evolve into?
Ellen Davis
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control