
Transatlantic regulatory convergence inches closer
Daily news headlines
A new framework for the promotion of transatlantic economic integration will be unveiled today at an EU-US Summit in Washington DC.
The president of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, vice-presidents Günter Verheugen (enterprise and industry) and Jacques Barrot (transport) and commissioners Benita Ferrero-Waldner (external relations) and Peter Mandelson (trade) will represent the Commission at the summit, which is hosted by US President George W. Bush. German chancellor Angela Merkel will represent the EU presidency, assisted by secretary general/high representative Javier Solana.
The New Transatlantic Economic Partnership (NTEP) initiative launched by the German presidency will focus on increased regulatory co-ordination between the EU and the US. The move, fully supported by the European Banking Federation (EBF), points out that since the launch of the Financial Markets Regulatory Dialogue in 2002, dialogue between the two entities has improved but the EBF wants a broader and more intense co-operation within that framework, linked to more transparency and consultation. It hopes the FMRD can become a co-ordination tool for major financial services legislation and regulation.
“We really believe that more regulatory co-ordination between the world’s two largest single markets is crucial if we are to enhance the benefits for financial institutions, enterprises and consumers, on both sides of the Atlantic,” said Guido Ravoet, secretary general of the EBF.
The lack of convergence on financial regulatory issues between the EU and US is surprising considering the constant interaction between the two markets. One source, commenting on Regulation NMS and Mifid best execution requirements, said he was “shocked and appalled” that there was no discussion between the two powers when drawing up regulations that refer to the same issue. That said, the implementation of Mifid in Europe does clear a path for EU-US convergence, because so many US banks will need to become Mifid-compliant due to having such a large cross-border business, and with many divisions based in London.
That said, as highlighted by New York mayor Bloomberg’s report, London and New York are competing with each other and with major Asian cities, for the status of the leading global financial centre. The financial regulatory environment is increasingly being viewed as a competitive issue, even more so in the US, where recent research suggests that Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 is causing companies to shun New York in favour of launching an IPO in London.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control